
It seems that Obama may be upsetting the anti-war leftists in his party with his expected announcement of sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. Interestingly enough, these same people all complained that Bush was ignoring Afghanistan in favor or Iraq, indeed Obama himself said:
“His plan comes up short. There’s not enough troops, not enough resources and not enough urgency. What President Bush and Senator McCain don’t understand is that the central front in the War on Terror is not in Iraq and never was. The central front is in Afghanistan and Pakistan where the terrorists who hit us on 9-11 are still plotting attacks seven years later.”This was only one short year ago. Obama would still be delaying any decision if he hadn't had so much pressure put on him by Republicans and the media. Unfortunately, the radical left doesn't approve of Obama's expected surge:
Barack Obama
Campaign Speech
September 9, 2008
Anti-War Left Protests Obama's Afghanistan War Strategy
Activist groups are joining liberal members of Congress in condemning the president's expected announcement on Tuesday that he will order roughly 30,000 more troops to the war zone as part of an overhauled strategy to finish what President Bush started eight years ago.I don't understand. Isn't THIS the war the left said we should be fighting? Isn't THIS the war the left said Bush was ignoring? Isn't THIS the just cause we should have been pursuing? Now that they are in charge, we are to abandon it?
"I simply can't believe you're about to do what they say you are going to do," documentary filmmaker Michael Moore said in an open letter to Obama posted on his Web site. Moore warned that Obama would tarnish his legacy, turn away his supporters and effectively crown himself the new "war president" by escalating the war in Afghanistan.Gosh, let's hope that Obama doesn't care what a fat, left wing, proven liar thinks.
"With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics," Moore wrote. "Your potential decision to expand the war ... will do more to set your legacy in stone than any of the great things you've said and done in your first year.
"For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the future of our nation, stop. For God's sake, stop," Moore wrote.
MoveOn.org had this to say:
"President Obama is poised to make a critical decision about the Afghanistan war in the next few weeks. He needs to hear that we need an exit strategy -- not tens of thousands more troops stuck in a quagmire," the group's Web site says.Any of this sound familiar? Quagmire? Exit strategy? Well, it should because it was exactly what all the dems were screaming about with Iraq. They claimed that the 20,000 troop surge that Bush ordered was going to be useless and futile. In fact, Obama had this to say about the troop surge in Iraq.
"I don’t think the president’s strategy is going to work. We went through two weeks of hearings on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; experts from across the spectrum–military and civilian, conservative and liberal–expressed great skepticism about it. My suggestion to the president has been that the only way we’re going to change the dynamic in Iraq and start seeing political commendation is actually if we create a system of phased redeployment. And, frankly, the president, I think, has not been willing to consider that option, not because it’s not militarily sound but because he continues to cling to the belief that somehow military solutions are going to lead to victory in Iraq."Very eloquent, Obama, except you were wrong. The surge did work and Iraq has had some of the lowest violence levels since the war started. Now, apparently, the left is convinced that a surge won't work in Afghanistan. Picking up a trend here?
Peter Wehner at the Weekly Standard wrote up a great article about the success of the surge and how it made the dems look pretty incompetent.
Obama, then, was not only wrong about the surge; he was spectacularly wrong. And he continued to remain wrong even as mounting evidence of its success gave way to overwhelming evidence of its success.Ouch!! It's just sad that the dems have not learned from recent history.











